Digital Claxon

Entries tagged as ‘relationships’

Digital dating

June 30, 2008 · 6 Comments

I had a friend recently join an Internet dating site. After hearing complaints that the guys showing an interest in her were not the type of men she wanted to attract, I offered my communication expertise to spice up her profile. After creating a fake profile titled “I fuck on the first date” and sending my friend a message, I began perusing the site, you know, solely for marketing research.

What I first noticed was the lack of distinction between profiles. Being a student of digital communication, I applied Anderson’s long tail model to the people on the site. Everyone on the site had the same interests (skiing, movies, music, going out, and other things that everyone likes) most likely in an attempt to appeal to the largest audience. But appealing to the largest audience doesn’t actually help people find “the one.”

To better understand the long tail model, let’s quickly digress to people’s taste in movies, also a common date activity. Netflix compares movies you’ve rated to other users, providing suggestions from people that gave the same rating to movies we’ve both already watched. If I rated Ran three stars, Pee-Wee’s Big Adventure 4 Stars and Ping-Pong 5 stars, Netflix would suggest highly rated movies from people that agreed with my ratings. Since no two people will agree on everything, Netflix provides a statistic called “similar to you,” indicating the percentage of movies agreed upon. As I browsed the site, I realized that most people agree with about 50 percent of my ratings. These movies are usually the blockbuster movies of the moment, Transformers, Harry Potter, The Star Wars, etc. that everyone sees or has heard of. Its the equivalent of asking people if they liked movies in general, I bet more than 80 percent of people would agree. Now if I said like movies directed by Akira Kurosawa, probably 10 percent of the population knows who that is, and fewer people like his work. The long tail model says that the majority of the population has quite a bit in common (due to pop culture, being educated by a federally regulated institution, etc.), but as people start to experience less main stream things (specialized degrees, location they grew up in, religion) their commonalities decrease.

Tying this back into dating and the long tail model, most people like about 50 percent of the same things. When you get into the more obscure work, the Kurosawas, do you realize how different and varied your tastes actually are. The dating sites (match.com in this case) use a simple search to match people up based on their interests. If you put “movies” as your interests, you’ll likely get everyone on the site when you really want someone special. It’s akin to trying to find the flick Interstella 5555 by typing “movies” into a Google search.

My advice to my friend looking for love on the net, post your obscure interests. The guys that send you date requests are exactly the same because you list very nebulous, general interests. Tell people you like reading romance novels instead of saying “books;” instead of being an “adventure seeker,” let people know that you like walking the dog late at night in rough parts of DC; say you love Ohio State athletics instead of “watching sports;” and rather than telling people you like “a good time,” let them know you laugh the hardest in Judd Apatow comedies. You’ll find people that have a lot more in common with you. As the saying goes, “It’s the little things.”

Crazier still, the people in the casual encounters section of the craigslist personals have it right. They tell you exactly what they want on a date. Maybe with too much detail. There is a difference between unique and perverse.

As my friend had been on Match.com, a service that truly is a Google search for “singles,” I decided to see if eHarmony would provide better results. eHarmony’s advertisements claim it matches people based on a series of detailed questions that provide worthwhile results. Now, for the final part of this entry, my honest answers to eHarmony landed a rejection notice. I’m not joking. Below is the screen shot. I guess I’m either a psycho or I’m too far out on the long tail for a decent match. That’s probably why I’m single.

eharmony rejection!

Categories: Internet · social news
Tagged: , , , ,

Social network relationships and real world breakups

May 12, 2008 · 3 Comments

My relationship status recently went from “it’s complicated” to “single.” My torrid love life is not really the reason I’m writing this post, but is a precursor into the subject. What do you do with your ex on the social networks you both belong to?

Am I supposed to make it known that I’m on the market? I mean, isn’t that the real reason for social networking Web sites anyway - to stalk the other attractive single people? Am I supposed to remove pics of us together so other people know that I’m available?

Although the photos help me remember good times, what am I supposed to do when I meet someone while I’m out and they friend me on Facebook? I don’t really want the new interest to think I’m dating someone, but my photo albums would suggest otherwise. I don’t usually advertise my relationship status (or sexual orientation for that matter) because its really no one’s business, but how do I get the message across to the girl I just met that I’m single when she’s browsing my photo albums and sees 50 or so pics of me holding hands with the same girl?

I don’t hate my ex, so it’s not like I feel a strong desire to take the photos down. I don’t want to send the wrong message to her either. How would she react if I suddenly untagged myself in all of her photo albums? The ex might be upset that I’m trying to forget about her (we’ve had several postmortem conversations, and she continually says that she doesn’t want me to forget all the good times we had) or interpret my actions as hostile. I’m not that angry person cutting out their former fling from all the pictures in the album (admittedly, it would be funny if I Photoshopped other people into her place). At the same time, if I entered into another relationship, the new girl would probably find it awkward that I’m hanging all over some girl like a monkey on a banana. I imagine these photos would be the source of many drunken arguments and the new girl would likely talk to her friends about the insecurities this causes. That or I would be told to get over it already as I tried to not have a second breakup in as many months.

What do I do with all the mutual acquaintances that I met through my ex and will never speak to again? Do I unfriend them? They didn’t really do anything wrong. Although many of them were nice, I don’t really have any desire to strike up a conversation. As far as I’m concerned, they shouldn’t be keeping tabs on me and they really don’t need to know what I’m up to. Thankfully, no we had no mutual acquaintances prior to meeting, making going back to our regular routines much easier. I can’t imagine what would happen if mutual friends were forced to pick a side. Would I be set to limited profile view for certain people because my ex was posting messages about me?

Digitizing our lives really brings a lot of new situations that still need societal norms. So, take the pics down, untag myself or post enough new pics that these are 40 pages deep in the photo albums? You tell me.

Categories: Internet
Tagged: , ,